New Segmentation Paradigm or How to Qualify a Lead?

I just ran across this quote from Will Schnabel and it gave me pause. In Lead Score and Activity Alerts: One in the same?, Schnabel says, “In order to identify the few qualified prospects from the remainder of the inquiries, you first need to determine your ideal customer profile or in other words, what segment is your best target. From there, BANT questions (budget, authority, need, and time frame) help determine the qualification status of the leads.”

So I agree with the last part. BANT qualification is important, especially in the B2B and B2P (Business to Prosumer) markets. After all, no one will ever buy your product without budget or the authority to make decisions. It’s the first part that’s becoming increasingly interesting and more complicated for me. Is the customer profile so rigidly first in this timeline? Or is privileging this activity just another reason that the Marketing/Sales political split persists? Certainly, this is the right way to pursue new business strategically: decide the size and relative need of a target market, build or alter product to address needs in that market, create messaging that speaks to the market about its needs, and then attack the target market.

Well, what happens when that target segment trickles in while a different segment - one not entirely counted on - starts to beat down your doors? OK. If the doors are really being kicked in, your company is likely to notice. But let’s say that this secondary segment buys on par with the target. Sales is likely to notice it first, right? And this is usually what causes the rift between marketing and sales: The marketing department often continues to chase the strategically-desired and well-messaged segments instead of the empirically-best segments.

This is where a data mining approach refines the way we look at segments. There may be unforeseen criteria that ultimately make its way into the segmentation definition. Clickthrough data is the most interesting and most-discussed piece of data in this vein. Schnabel would have you believe that this data determines the relative need of the segment in the BANT qualification. I say, why can’t it be part of the segment itself? A shrewd marketing department might change the amount of information available on the website so that the “heavy researcher” psychographic segment is more fully qualified. Particularly if the heavy researcher is also a heavy buyer.

Many companies are starting to break down the barriers of B2B and B2C. The B2P audience is a great example of this. This means that traditional customer segmentation is becoming more difficult. Customers may be segmented along demographic, business history, behavioral, and psychographic variables all at once. Ultimately, a data mining-aided approach to customer segmentation lets you adapt to customers who find you by breaking with these traditional barriers to make segmentation a fluid discipline.

Tags: Data Mining, Lead Qualification, lead scoring

Add Personalized Product Recommendations to Your eCommerce Site

Istobe is a powerful recommendation engine that makes it easy to add recommendations to your eCommerce site. How powerful? Shoppers who click on Istobe recommendations spend 20-50% more than the average visitor.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 at 7:41 pm and is filed under Data Mining, Lead Qualification. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.